Professional Biography
Managing Partner & Senior Panel Counsel Union Of India
Advocate Vikas Sharma "Nagwan" is the Managing Partner of the firm, distinguished by his commanding presence as a lead Arguing Counsel before the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.
With an unyielding focus on Criminal Litigation and Constitutional Law, he is frequently called upon to navigate the most complex intersections of statutory interpretation, procedural law, and fundamental rights. In the courtroom, Mr. Sharma does not simply recite precedents; he crafts compelling, bulletproof narratives that dismantle opposing arguments. He understands that behind every rigorous legal strategy is a human element, and his approach bridges the gap between encyclopedic legal knowledge and decisive courtroom execution.
His authoritative grasp of appellate advocacy is recognized at the highest levels of government, culminating in his prestigious appointment as Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India. In this capacity, he represents the State in critical matters of national importance. This rare, dual-perspective experience—understanding exactly how the State prosecutes and defends—makes him an exceptionally formidable defense counsel in private practice.
Whether dissecting the intricate nuances of the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) frameworks, defending core constitutional liberties, or intervening in high-stakes appellate matters, his representation is defined by strategic foresight. As Managing Partner, Mr. Sharma instills this philosophy of "strategic autonomy" across the entire firm, ensuring that every client receives counsel that is not only legally impenetrable, but practically unshakeable.
Advocate Vikas Nagwan: Supreme Court of India's Leading Criminal Lawyer & Family Law Expert
In the complex landscape of the Indian judicial system, few legal professionals have managed to build a reputation for both courtroom expertise and accessible legal education as effectively as Advocate Vikas Nagwan. A practising advocate at the Supreme Court of India and Chairman of Juris Law Offices, Nagwan has emerged as a leading voice in criminal law, family disputes, and men's rights, frequently appearing in high-profile cases and sharing his insights across major media platforms. His straightforward, no-nonsense approach to explaining intricate legal provisions has made him a sought‑after expert for everything from property division after divorce to the dos and don'ts of surrendering in a criminal case.
This comprehensive profile explores the career, legal philosophy, notable cases, and media contributions of Advocate Vikas Nagwan, offering valuable insights for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of India's legal system.
Professional Background and Practice Areas
Advocate Vikas Nagwan is based in Delhi and practises before the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court, and various trial courts. Advocate Nagwan's practice spans several critical domains of Indian law:
Practice Area
| Criminal Law | Bail, anticipatory bail, criminal appeals, white‑collar crimes, fraud, money circulation schemes |
| Family Law & Matrimonial Disputes | Divorce (contested & mutual consent), maintenance, alimony, child custody, domestic violence, Section 498A |
| Men’s Rights | Legal safeguards against false allegations, misuse of matrimonial laws, equitable treatment |
| Constitutional & Writ Jurisdiction | Public interest litigation (PIL), writ petitions before High Courts and the Supreme Court |
| Property & Civil Disputes | Partition suits, property rights, recovery matters |
Legal Philosophy and Signature Stance
One of Advocate Nagwan's most widely cited legal opinions concerns the strategic disadvantage of surrendering at a police station. He argues that a person suspected of a crime should never surrender to the police directly. Instead, the accused should approach a magistrate or a High Court with a surrender‑cum‑bail application. This approach offers multiple advantages:
- Police often record in the arrest memo that they caught the accused trying to flee, which can harm the bail plea.
- Surrendering before a court places the accused directly in judicial custody, reducing the risk of custodial violence.
- The court is made aware that the accused has not attempted to evade the legal process, which improves the prospects of obtaining bail.
Family Law: Clarifying Property Rights
On the widely misunderstood question of whether an ex‑wife can claim half her husband's property, Advocate Nagwan has provided a clear explanation to News18. He points out that while the **Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005** permits a wife to reside in her husband's home during the pendency of a divorce, that right ceases once the divorce is finalised. Indian divorce law focuses on maintenance and alimony, not automatic property division. A wife cannot claim ownership of property that is solely in the husband's name, either during or after the divorce proceedings. He notes that much of the confusion arises from men Googling American laws, where marital property is divided, and mistakenly applying those principles to India.
Men's Rights and Gender Bias
Nagwan has consistently highlighted what he sees as an asymmetry in Indian matrimonial laws. On the Raj Shamani podcast, he observed that a husband may be forced to pay maintenance for a child that is not biologically his, while the legal system offers men little protection against false allegations. He has bluntly stated that the law's protection against fake accusations is "zero," and such false cases undermine the credibility of legitimate victims. His stance is not anti‑women but rather a call for equal treatment under the law, arguing that many statutes that were designed to protect women are now being misused as weapons in marital disputes.
Doctrine of Verifiability
On his personal blog, Nagwan has articulated the "Doctrine of Verifiability" — a legal principle he proposes to counter vagueness in penal statutes. He argues that no coercive law should be framed in ambiguous language, because vague provisions corrode the rule of law and grant excessive discretion to the state. This reflects his broader commitment to legal clarity and procedural fairness.
Notable Cases and Appearances
Supreme Court: Vivek Bindra Scam Case
In February 2024, the Supreme Court issued notice on a writ petition seeking a CBI probe into an alleged nationwide scam involving motivational speaker Vivek Bindra and his company Bada Business Pvt Ltd. Alongside Senior Advocate Vikas Singh and others, Advocate Vikas Nagwan appeared for the petitioners, who claimed they had been duped into depositing large sums of money. The bench of Justices MM Sundresh and SVN Bhatti sought responses from the Centre and other parties. The Supreme Court record lists Nagwan as an advocate for the petitioners, alongside Mr. Sureshan P and Ms. Manvi Rajvanshy.
Delhi High Court: ICAI Moderation Dispute
In 2018, a division bench of the Delhi High Court directed the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to produce all documents relating to the moderation procedure for final exam results. Nagwan, representing a group of students, argued that the change in results had been made after de‑codification, raising questions of personal bias. The court's order came after nearly 5,000 students were impacted by a last‑minute revision of their examination outcomes.
Delhi High Court: GGSIPU Admission Cancellation
Three B.Tech students of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) moved the Delhi High Court after their admissions were cancelled over alleged submission of "fake documents" during migration from William Carey University. **Advocates Vikas Nagwan and Manvi Rajvanshy represented the students**, arguing that they had been defrauded by an agency and that the university had not given them a proper opportunity to be heard. Justice Pr
Advocate Vikas Sharma "Nagwan" is the Managing Partner of the firm, distinguished by his commanding presence as a lead Arguing Counsel before the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.
With an unyielding focus on Criminal Litigation and Constitutional Law, he is frequently called upon to navigate the most complex intersections of statutory interpretation, procedural law, and fundamental rights. In the courtroom, Mr. Sharma does not simply recite precedents; he crafts compelling, bulletproof narratives that dismantle opposing arguments. He understands that behind every rigorous legal strategy is a human element, and his approach bridges the gap between encyclopedic legal knowledge and decisive courtroom execution.
His authoritative grasp of appellate advocacy is recognized at the highest levels of government, culminating in his prestigious appointment as Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India. In this capacity, he represents the State in critical matters of national importance. This rare, dual-perspective experience—understanding exactly how the State prosecutes and defends—makes him an exceptionally formidable defense counsel in private practice.
Whether dissecting the intricate nuances of the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) frameworks, defending core constitutional liberties, or intervening in high-stakes appellate matters, his representation is defined by strategic foresight. As Managing Partner, Mr. Sharma instills this philosophy of "strategic autonomy" across the entire firm, ensuring that every client receives counsel that is not only legally impenetrable, but practically unshakeable.
Advocate Vikas Nagwan: Supreme Court of India's Leading Criminal Lawyer & Family Law Expert
In the complex landscape of the Indian judicial system, few legal professionals have managed to build a reputation for both courtroom expertise and accessible legal education as effectively as Advocate Vikas Nagwan. A practising advocate at the Supreme Court of India and Chairman of Juris Law Offices, Nagwan has emerged as a leading voice in criminal law, family disputes, and men's rights, frequently appearing in high-profile cases and sharing his insights across major media platforms. His straightforward, no-nonsense approach to explaining intricate legal provisions has made him a sought‑after expert for everything from property division after divorce to the dos and don'ts of surrendering in a criminal case.
This comprehensive profile explores the career, legal philosophy, notable cases, and media contributions of Advocate Vikas Nagwan, offering valuable insights for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of India's legal system.
Professional Background and Practice Areas
Advocate Vikas Nagwan is based in Delhi and practises before the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court, and various trial courts. Advocate Nagwan's practice spans several critical domains of Indian law:
Practice Area
| Criminal Law | Bail, anticipatory bail, criminal appeals, white‑collar crimes, fraud, money circulation schemes |
| Family Law & Matrimonial Disputes | Divorce (contested & mutual consent), maintenance, alimony, child custody, domestic violence, Section 498A |
| Men’s Rights | Legal safeguards against false allegations, misuse of matrimonial laws, equitable treatment |
| Constitutional & Writ Jurisdiction | Public interest litigation (PIL), writ petitions before High Courts and the Supreme Court |
| Property & Civil Disputes | Partition suits, property rights, recovery matters |
Legal Philosophy and Signature Stance
One of Advocate Nagwan's most widely cited legal opinions concerns the strategic disadvantage of surrendering at a police station. He argues that a person suspected of a crime should never surrender to the police directly. Instead, the accused should approach a magistrate or a High Court with a surrender‑cum‑bail application. This approach offers multiple advantages:
- Police often record in the arrest memo that they caught the accused trying to flee, which can harm the bail plea.
- Surrendering before a court places the accused directly in judicial custody, reducing the risk of custodial violence.
- The court is made aware that the accused has not attempted to evade the legal process, which improves the prospects of obtaining bail.
Family Law: Clarifying Property Rights
On the widely misunderstood question of whether an ex‑wife can claim half her husband's property, Advocate Nagwan has provided a clear explanation to News18. He points out that while the **Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005** permits a wife to reside in her husband's home during the pendency of a divorce, that right ceases once the divorce is finalised. Indian divorce law focuses on maintenance and alimony, not automatic property division. A wife cannot claim ownership of property that is solely in the husband's name, either during or after the divorce proceedings. He notes that much of the confusion arises from men Googling American laws, where marital property is divided, and mistakenly applying those principles to India.
Men's Rights and Gender Bias
Nagwan has consistently highlighted what he sees as an asymmetry in Indian matrimonial laws. On the Raj Shamani podcast, he observed that a husband may be forced to pay maintenance for a child that is not biologically his, while the legal system offers men little protection against false allegations. He has bluntly stated that the law's protection against fake accusations is "zero," and such false cases undermine the credibility of legitimate victims. His stance is not anti‑women but rather a call for equal treatment under the law, arguing that many statutes that were designed to protect women are now being misused as weapons in marital disputes.
Doctrine of Verifiability
On his personal blog, Nagwan has articulated the "Doctrine of Verifiability" — a legal principle he proposes to counter vagueness in penal statutes. He argues that no coercive law should be framed in ambiguous language, because vague provisions corrode the rule of law and grant excessive discretion to the state. This reflects his broader commitment to legal clarity and procedural fairness.
Notable Cases and Appearances
Supreme Court: Vivek Bindra Scam Case
In February 2024, the Supreme Court issued notice on a writ petition seeking a CBI probe into an alleged nationwide scam involving motivational speaker Vivek Bindra and his company Bada Business Pvt Ltd. Alongside Senior Advocate Vikas Singh and others, Advocate Vikas Nagwan appeared for the petitioners, who claimed they had been duped into depositing large sums of money. The bench of Justices MM Sundresh and SVN Bhatti sought responses from the Centre and other parties. The Supreme Court record lists Nagwan as an advocate for the petitioners, alongside Mr. Sureshan P and Ms. Manvi Rajvanshy.
Delhi High Court: ICAI Moderation Dispute
In 2018, a division bench of the Delhi High Court directed the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to produce all documents relating to the moderation procedure for final exam results. Nagwan, representing a group of students, argued that the change in results had been made after de‑codification, raising questions of personal bias. The court's order came after nearly 5,000 students were impacted by a last‑minute revision of their examination outcomes.
Delhi High Court: GGSIPU Admission Cancellation
Three B.Tech students of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) moved the Delhi High Court after their admissions were cancelled over alleged submission of "fake documents" during migration from William Carey University. **Advocates Vikas Nagwan and Manvi Rajvanshy represented the students**, arguing that they had been defrauded by an agency and that the university had not given them a proper opportunity to be heard. Justice Pr